The pop star and her beau Travis Kelce, 34, made waves after a donning distinctive Gucci outfit to the men’s final of the US Open on Sunday

‘The brand would get over $50 million in value from the images and video being seen all over the world,’ the expert added.

Evan added that it’s likely this figure is for Travis alone – but experts haven’t ruled out Taylor pocketing a pretty penny from her designer pieces too.

Taylor wore a red gingham mini dress by Reformation, complete with a corset bust to watch Jannik Sinner defeat Taylor Fritz in the men’s final, pairing it with a striking red lip.

Travis wore an eye-catching Gucci bucket hat, polo shirt and cardigan.

Taylor stepped out in a Gucci mini dress several hours later for a dinner with her NFL boyfriend – wearing a two-toned brown mini dress with black strappy heels and a $3,000 handbag by the Italian fashion house.

While the decision for the pair’s logo heavy outfits may well have been coincidental, there also could have been a financial motive, with stylist to the stars Jessica Paster previously revealing that celebrities can be paid up to $250,000 to wear a designer’s outfits.

The superstar songstress doesn’t currently gave any partnerships with brands but has in the past.

From 2008 to 2010, the pop star featured in several campaigns for L.E.I Jeans, and was the face of CoverGirl’s NatureLuxe collection in 2010.

Taylor stepped out in head-to-toe Gucci in New York on Sunday evening, hours after the NFL star made the same fashion choice

The beloved popstar has come under fire for recently for hanging out with Brittany Mahomes, who has publicly shown her support for republication presidential candidate Donald Trump

On Tuesday, Travis’s representatives were forced to deny that the couple have plans to split later this month after a document written on the headed paper of his US PR company was spread online

Stylist to the stars Jessica Paster has previously revealing that celebrities can be paid up to $250,000 to wear a designer’s outfits

She dabbled in fragrances with Elizabeth Arden between 2011 and 2014, and was a Diet Coke ambassador from 2013 to 2018.

‘If she doesn’t agree to appear in ads, it’s because she doesn’t need to. She doesn’t need to expand her business with other initiatives because, right now, there is no brand that’s bigger and more recognized than the Taylor Swift brand,’ says Yeray S. Iborra, author of the book The Taylor Swift Phenomenon, as per El Pais.

‘For years, she has made a great effort to control each and every one of the things she says or does. Partnering with a company implies associating with a third party, which always entails risks,’  he explained.

‘A collaboration of this type could involve her in some controversy indirectly, either due to an erroneous statement or by supporting initiatives that do not agree with her fans. Therefore, it is understandable that she prefers to avoid any type of collateral damage.’

The beloved popstar has come under fire for recently for hanging out with Brittany Mahomes, who has publicly shown her support for republication presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Yet the pals brushed off the rumors as they were seen gleefully hugging each other at the tennis tournament in Queens.

Many fans took to social media over the weekend to voice their disappointment in Taylor for still being friends with Brittany, given her support for Trump and that she had defended brother-in-law Jackson Mahomes amid sexual assault allegations.